USPTO serial 77020479
CITY-GATES ECONOMY QUAILTY SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY-GATES ECONOMY QUAILTY SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela M. Morisco
ANGELA M MORISCO1520 129TH STCOLLEGE POINT, NY 11356-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal security gates, namely roll-up doors and grilles, metal cellar and basement doors, metal window guards and counter doors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1969 |
| 037 | installation and repair of security roll-up doors and grilles, cellar and basement doors, window guards and counter doors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1969 |
| 040 | custom manufacturing of security roll-up doors and grilles, cellar and basement doors, window guards and counter doors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1969 |
| 042 | retail store services featuring security roll-up doors and grilles, cellar and basement doors, window guards and counter doors; distributorships in the field of security roll-up doors and grilles, cellar and basement doors, window guards and counter doors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by City Store Gates Mfg. Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CITY-GATES ECONOMY QUAILTY SERVICE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |