USPTO serial 77020500
MENUGISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3591741Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MENUGISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PLANO, TX
Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Coralville, IA
Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
Coralville, IA
Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
CORALVILLE, IA
CORALVILLE, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Martin, Esq.
Paul W. Martin, Esq. NCR Corporation3097 Satellite Boulevard, Bldg 700Law DepartmentDuluth, GA 30096Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for generating customized in-house menus for use in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry; computer software for accumulating and analyzing nutritional and diet data and generating reports for a dietary management program in the institutional food industry and restaurant industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RETALIX USA, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hawkeye Foodservice Distribution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MENUGISTICS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by MENUGISTICS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MENUGISTICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |