USPTO serial 77020761
INTERUSH ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERUSH ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA
IRVINE, CA
IRVINE, CA
IRVINE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine B. Redfield
CHRISTINE B REDFIELD KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM630 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, CD-ROMs containing programs in language instruction, cross-cultural education, computer instruction and education, and e-commerce instruction and education; computer wide-access network operating software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials in the field of computers, e-commerce, language instruction and cross-cultural education | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Shirts, t-shirts, sweaters, jackets, vests, and hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic communications via internet networks; electronic transmission of voices, video, images, animation and sound via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing classes and seminars in the fields of news, weather, sports, and current events; providing on-line educational information in the fields of language instruction and culture via the Internet; providing foreign language instruction and providing on-line classes and workshops in the field of cross-cultural education; providing training services in the field of computers; providing education and training services in the field of e-commerce through online classes and online courses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interush, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERUSH HOLDINGS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERUSH HOLDINGS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERUSH HOLDINGS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INTERUSH ACADEMY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |