Drawing for FOOTLOGIX SPA-CEUTICALS

USPTO serial 77020863

FOOTLOGIX SPA-CEUTICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOTLOGIX SPA-CEUTICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fay O'Brien

FAY O'BRIEN O'BRIEN TM SERVICES INC688 TWEEDSMUIR AVEOTTAWA ONTARIO, K1Z5P6CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated footcare products, namely, foot lotions, foot sprays, foot creams, foot gels and foot powders sold exclusively for the salon and spa marketACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 1, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance