USPTO serial 77021062
MEMORIES OF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEMORIES OF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SHOWER WASH, BODY LOTION, HAND CREME, BODY BUTTER CREME, BUBBLE BATH, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALT, NON-MEDICATED SPA TYPE BODY TREATMENTS, NAMELY BODY MASK, SALT BODY SCRUB AND MINERAL BATH SOAKS; BODY FIRMING GEL, CELLULITE CREME, DRY BODY OIL SPRAY, NON-MEDICATED FOOT SPRAY, FOOT SCRUB, FOOT SOAK BATH, FOOT BALM, AND FOOT CREME; NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM AND LIP EXFOLIATOR; SOY MILK BATH, CREME BODY WASH, BODY SPRAY, ROOM FRAGRANCE SPRAY, NON-MEDICATED FOOT COOLING GEL, BAR SKIN SOAP, LIQUID SKIN SOAP, BODY POWDER, FIRMING MASQUE, FIRMING FACIAL SPRAY, PREMOISTENED EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER PADS, HAND EXFOLIATING CREME, NON-MEDICATED HAND WASH, FACIAL SCRUB, FACIAL MASK, BODY SPARKLE CREME, BODY SHIMMER CREME, REFRESHING FACIAL SPRAY, FACIAL GEL, BODY CREME | ACTIVE | Oct 13, 2006 |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | Oct 13, 2006 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, HATS, CAPS, FOOTWEAR, UNDERWEAR, TOWELS, SHIRTS AND ROBES | ACTIVE | Oct 13, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |