Drawing for SOUL PROVIDER

USPTO serial 77021155

SOUL PROVIDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUL PROVIDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hector Baldonado, Esq.

HECTOR BALDONADO ESQ BALDONADO & ASSOCIATES PC481 8TH AVE STE 839NEW YORK, NY 10001-1809UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025(Based on Intent to Use) Clothing, namely, pants, shoes, shirts, shorts, headwearACTIVE—
035Management of performing artists, namely, personal, business and career management services and representation servicesACTIVEJul 5, 2001
041Record production; record master production; music production; audio recording and production; videotape production; entertainment services, namely, producing musical audio and video recordings; entertainment in the nature of a live musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; entertainment, namely, personal appearances by a musical artist, musical band and musical group; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, commentary and articles about music, all online via a global computer networkACTIVEJan 9, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 27, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance