USPTO serial 77021219
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; Telematics apparatus, namely, wireless Internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; UPI (universal peripheral interface) hardware; USB (universal serial bus) hardware; Vehicle locator and recovery device programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular telecommunications; VPN (virtual private network) hardware; VPN (virtual private network) operating software; WAN (wide area network) hardware; WAN (wide area network) operating software; Wide area networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |