Drawing for MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING

USPTO serial 77022128

MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Munck

WILLIAM A. MUNCK MUNCK BUTRUS, P.C.DOCKET CLERKP.O. DRAWER 800889DALLAS, TX 75380

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Bowling equipment, namely, bowling pins, bowling ball returns, bowling balls, bowling ball covers, bowling pinsetters and parts therefore, bowling bags, bowling deflectors, bowling gloves, bowling pit mats, and masking unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 19, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 2, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance