USPTO serial 77022145
TRENDS BEAUTY CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3825431Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2010
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRENDS BEAUTY CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUBEN ALCOBA, ESQ.
RUBEN ALCOBA, ESQ. ALCOBA & ASSOCIATES, P.A.3399 NW 72 AVENUESUITE 211MIAMI, FL 33122Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Beauty salons; Hair replacement, hair addition, and hair extension services; Hair salon, namely, treatments to protect hair from affects of exposure to sunlight, heat, humidity and chlorinated water; Hairdressing salons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2009 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |