USPTO serial 77022173
POWERED BY WAVETREND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERED BY WAVETREND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P. Bhatti,
FARAH P BHATTI MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVESTE 500IRVINE, CA 92612-7108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological research and design services in the field of radio frequency identification technology and solutions, security and security systems, computer networks, computer programs and computing apparatus and equipment; industrial analysis and research services in the field of radio frequency identification technology and solutions, security and security systems, computer networks, computer programs and computing apparatus and equipment; design and development of computer hardware and software in the field of radio frequency identification technology and solutions, security and security systems, computer networks and computing apparatus and equipment; legal services; technical and technological research and consultation services in the field of security and security structures, security systems including security services for computer networks, computer access and computerized transactions; technical and technological consultation services in the field of active ultra long range (ULR) radio frequency identification technology and solutions, security systems; computer planning, planning, design and inspection for quality control of computers, computer apparatus and equipment, data scanning and processing apparatus and equipment; consultation services in the field of selection and use of computers, computer apparatus and equipment, data scanning and processing apparatus and equipment for others; creation of control programs for electric operation control and drive modules; technical monitoring services for conditions of facilities, namely, remote monitoring of heating, ventilating and air-conditioning apparatus; technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware systems, computer programming for others; technology supervision and inspection in the field of active ultra long range (ULR) radio frequency identification technology and solutions; consultation services in the field of selection of computer hardware and software for others; research services in the field of intelligence and security; computer consultation in the field of computer security engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |