USPTO serial 77022209
OP-ADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OP-ADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bellevue, WA
Bellevue, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Vana
James L. Vana PERKINS COIE LLPSUITE 48001201 THIRD AVENUESEATTLE, WA 98101-3099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for automating the scheduling (specifying what content should be displayed in which locations at which times), distribution (ensuring that media devices receive the needed data to display the content), play or display, and measurement (what content showed when and where, as well as measurement of the performance in terms of impact of the campaign on audience behavior as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic, and number of people interacting with a kiosk) of media advertising and marketing campaigns as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; computer software for facilitating the exchange of data on the behavior and performance (what content was displayed, when and where; how many and what types of people were exposed to the content; data on subsequent audience behavior, namely, making a purchase in a store and entering a mall) of a network of media devices in public places; computer software for planning, scheduling, tracking, analyzing, monitoring, measuring, and reporting on the performance, as measured by the impact of the campaign on audience behavior as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic, and number of people interacting with a kiosk) of media advertising and marketing campaigns as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; computer software for optimizing the performance (in terms of measures of audience response or financial impact) of a media advertising campaign as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places by selectively choosing times and places for displaying the campaign; computer software for targeting of a media advertising campaign as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places by selectively choosing times and places for displaying the campaign so as to reach certain demographic groups and/or audiences that are the most responsive, taking into account the impact of the campaign on audience behavior as measured by sales, profits, foot traffic and number of people interacting with a kiosk; computer software for use in advertising and marketing campaigns for playing or displaying full motion video, static images, and/or animations for video display, with or without audio, audio recordings as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Preparation for others of advertising, marketing and promotional materials and campaigns and consumer-directed digital content as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; market research and analysis; conducting marketing studies; marketing consulting services; compiling, analyzing and monitoring the performance, effectiveness and results, as measured by the impact of the campaign on audience behavior as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic, and number of people interacting with a kiosk, of advertising, marketing and promotional materials and campaigns and consumer-directed advertising and marketing content as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; providing business marketing information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications for automating the scheduling (specifying what content should be displayed in which locations at which times), distribution (ensuring that media devices receive the needed data to display the content), play or display, and measurement (what content showed when and where, as well as measurement of the performance in terms of impact of the campaign on audience behavior as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic, and number of people interacting with a kiosk) of media advertising and marketing campaigns as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; application service provider (asp) services, namely, hosting computer software applications for facilitating the exchange of data on the behavior and performance (what content was displayed, when and where; how many and what types of people were exposed to the content; data on subsequent audience behavior, namely, making a purchase in a store and entering a mall) of a network of media devices in public places; application service provider (asp) services, namely, hosting computer software applications for scheduling, planning, tracking, analyzing, monitoring, measuring, and reporting on the performance, as measured by the impact of the campaign on audience behavior, as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic and number of people interacting with a kiosk) of media advertising and marketing campaigns as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places; application service provider (asp) services, namely, hosting computer software applications for optimizing the performance (in terms of measures of audience response or financial impact) of a media advertising campaign as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places by selectively choosing times and places for displaying the campaign; application service provider (asp) services, namely, hosting computer software applications targeting of a media advertising campaign as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places by selectively choosing times and places for displaying the campaign so as to reach certain demographic groups and/or audiences that are the most responsive, as measured by the impact of the campaign on audience behavior, as evidenced by sales, profits, foot traffic, and number of people interacting with a kiosk; computer software consulting services in connection with the foregoing application service provider services and in the fields of advertising and marketing; application service provider (asp) services, namely, hosting computer software for use in advertising and marketing campaigns for playing or displaying full motion video, static images, and/or animations for video display, with or without audio, audio recordings as displayed or played on a network of media devices in public places | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DS-IQ, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DS-IQ, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OP-ADS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |