USPTO serial 77022605
CONTOUR LIFT FACIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONTOUR LIFT FACIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Massage; consultation services in the field of cosmetics, massage, beauty care, make-up, body slimming, facial care, skin care, hair care, scalp care, and foot care; beauty salons; health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; providing information about cosmetics, massage, beauty care, make-up, body slimming, facial care, skin care, hair care, scalp care, and foot care; aromatherapy services; spa services for beauty and health care for humans, namely, aromatherapy, balneotherapy and thalassotherapy services; artificial sun tanning services; make-up analysis; and operation of sauna facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |