USPTO serial 77022673
RAPIDNANONET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3951052Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2011
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAPIDNANONET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Perry
David M. Perry Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square9th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing assistance in the form of a consortium for matching businesses, educational institutions, and governmental entities in order to develop prototypes and achieve product commercialization within the field of nanotechnology; association services, namely, promoting the interests of nanotechnology businesses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
- Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
- Other trademarks owned by Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RAPIDNANONET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |