USPTO serial 77023040
THE NEW YORK CENTER FOR CHILDREN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3400246Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE NEW YORK CENTER FOR CHILDREN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David O. Johanson, Esq.
David O. Johanson, Esq. Bingham McCutchen LLPOne Federal StreetBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Children's Advocacy Center of Manhattan
- Other trademarks owned by THE NEW YORK CENTER FOR CHILDREN
- Other trademarks owned by THE NEW YORK CENTER FOR CHILDREN
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE NEW YORK CENTER FOR CHILDREN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |