Drawing for JAMGEN

USPTO serial 77023153

JAMGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAMGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana Brody-Brown

Dana Brody-Brown Lewis and Roca LLP2440 W. El Camino Real, 6th FloorMountain View, CA 94040-1499UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, pullover shirts, sport shirts, denim shirts, jackets, coats, caps, visor, and headbandsACTIVE—
035Computerized on-line ordering services featuring goods in the nature of digital content files, particularly art, photography, music, and audio and visual entertainment content filesACTIVE—
038Providing access to electronic sites and databases containing digital content, namely, art, photography music, and audio and visual entertainment content via the internet; providing access to electronic sites and databases containing educational content in the areas of art and entertainmentACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring digital content, namely, art, photography, music, and audio and visual entertainment content via the internet; providing a website featuring educational content in the areas of art and entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance