Drawing for Serial No. 77023232

USPTO serial 77023232

Serial No. 77023232

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77023232?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner

MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-1199UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations for household use; all-purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; detergents; soaps; decalcifying and descaling preparations for household purposes; limescale removers, rust removers, stain removers, grease removers; drain and sink unblocking preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 11, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 11, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance