Drawing for COLD CASE

USPTO serial 77023464

COLD CASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLD CASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lew Hansen

LEW HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Brewed alcoholic beverages, namely, beerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 14, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 3, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 28, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 18, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 4, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 4, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 20, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 10, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 5, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance