USPTO serial 77023590
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich Marc E. Fineman, Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC2 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1300Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Hard surface coverings for floors; vinyl floor coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |