USPTO serial 77024249
*HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with *HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing information services via telephone in the field of real estate, namely, services whereby callers are given access to information on real estate properties for sale across Canada and the United States; providing a searchable database via telephone featuring real estate whereby callers will be able to locate real estate properties for sale | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |