USPTO serial 77024311
PRIMEROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIMEROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Brouillette
ROBERT BROUILLETTE BROUILLETTE & PARTNERS LLP1550 METCALFE, STE 800MONTREAL; PQC H3A1X6,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Paving stones; artificial stones; artificial tiles comprised of concrete; blocks for landscaping, namely, paving blocks and concrete blocks; stairs for landscaping, namely, stair treads not of metal for use in landscaping, paving stones for use as stairs in landscaping; concrete pre-cast units for masonry, namely, fireplace mantels; concrete building materials, namely, paving stones, slabs; kitchen countertops made of a mixture of rock and concrete; concrete walls and edging used in landscaping | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |