Drawing for INK-TEX

USPTO serial 77024363

INK-TEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INK-TEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy Kelly

Timothy Kelly Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textiles, namely, adhesive fabric for application by heat, blankets for outdoor use, handkerchiefs, textile wall hangings, cloth coasters, cloth flags, cloth pennants, cloth labels, upholstery fabric, fabric gift wrap; window curtains, draperies, fabric valances, swags and poufs; fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, linens and bedding; linens, namely, wash cloths, towels, dish cloths, cloth napkins, shower curtains, table linens; bedding, namely, bed linen, comforters, bed spreads, duvets, quilts, coverlets, blankets, mattress covers, mattress pads, bed canopies, pillow covers, pillow shams, bed skirts, crib bumpers and canopiesACTIVE—
025Clothing namely pants, shorts, sweat pants, track suits, shirts, T-shirts, sweaters, sweat shirts, dresses, skirts, suits, pajamas, bath robes, lingerie, underwear, aprons, coats, jackets, neck ties, pantyhose, scarves, mittens, gloves, belts, suspenders, head wear, footwear, swim wearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 16, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance