USPTO serial 77024402
ZENZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3756413Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZENZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; mineral nutritional supplements; ionic nutritional supplements; medicated preparations and lotions for the care of the skin and hair; dietary supplement drinks, nutritionally fortified beverages, powdered fruit-flavored dietary supplement drink mix, powdered nutritional supplement drink mix, vitamin fortified beverages; meal replacement drink mixes, meal replacement bars, meal replacement drinks, meal replacement powders, meal replacement shakes; herbal supplements; vitamins, mineral and naturopathic supplements in liquid, drops, tablet, powder, or capsule form | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 2005 |
| 032 | Energy drinks; fruit beverages, fruit juices and drinks, concentrated fruit drinks, fruit nectars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anthony Diaz
- Other trademarks owned by Anthony Diaz
- Other trademarks owned by Anthony Diaz
- Other trademarks owned by Lani Dizon
- Other trademarks owned by Lani Dizon
- Other trademarks owned by Lani Dizon
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ZENZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |