USPTO serial 77025309
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward H. Rosenthal
EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-5702UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen ladles; serving ladles, serving tongs; basins; bowls; mixing bowls; baskets of wicker and straw for domestic use; basting spoons; beer mugs; bottles, sold empty; soapboxes; brooms; hair brushes; pot cleaning brushes; scrubbing brushes; buckets; butter dishes; non-electric coffee pots; coffee services not of precious metals; confectioners' decorating bags; pastry bags; containers for household or kitchen use, not of precious metal; cookery molds; biscuit cutters; cookie jars; cooking pots; corkscrews; dishes; drinking glasses; earthenware bowls, plates, cups; egg cups not of precious metals; cooking pans; beverage glassware; jugs; glass storage jars; non-electric kettles; kitchen utensils, namely, whisks, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, skimmers, colanders, spatulas and turners; mixing spoons; pie servers; powder puffs; tea services not of precious metals; trays for domestic purposes not of precious metals; household utensils, namely, bottle openers, chop-sticks, cocktail stirrers, cooking skewers, graters, pastry cutters, garlic presses, ice-cream scoops, sieves, food basters, strainers, tea infusers, tea strainers; vases; vegetable dishes; cleaning combs and sponges | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |