Drawing for CIMPLICITY

USPTO serial 77026038

CIMPLICITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIMPLICITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nils E. Pedersen

Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street NWSuite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops, individual or collective training on the subject of the prevention and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and psoriasisACTIVE—
042Scientific research in the fields of healthcare, medicine and pharmacy, namely, research for the prevention and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and psoriasisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 30, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 25, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance