USPTO serial 77026422
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S 1ST ST FL 12SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, booklets, catalogues, manuals, handbooks, newsletters and magazines in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creating thinking, language and problem solving skills; Publications, namely, booklets, catalogues, manuals, handbooks, newsletters and magazines in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Greeting cards; Wrapping paper; Books in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Bookmarks; Stationary; Stationary envelopes; Newsletters in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Printed timetables; Loose-leaf binders; Manuals in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Handbooks in the field of education; Pamphlets in the field of education; Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Graphic art reproductions; Pictures; Scrapbooks; Calendars; Coasters of paper; Writing-pads; Magazines featuring preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Printed periodicals in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; Comic books; Pen cases; Pens and pencils; Paper and paper articles, namely, writing paper, coloured paper, drawing paper, articles of paper for packaging and wrapping, crepe paper articles, paper articles for use in relation to art and craft; Cardboard articles, namely, cardboard for use in wrapping and packaging, printed cardboard for display; Book bindings; Photographs; Adhesive materials for office use; Artists' materials, namely, brushes, pastels, paints, water colours, colour pencils, modeling clays, plasters, art paper, sketch books, artist's trays, chalk; Soft erasers; Charts in the field of preschool and childcare education and development, physical and mental development in children, motivation and organizational development, creative thinking, language and problem-solving skills; and posters | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |