Drawing for LEADING EDGE TONERS

USPTO serial 77027094

LEADING EDGE TONERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEADING EDGE TONERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard H. Kosakowski

RICHARD H KOSAKOWSKI O'SHEA, GETZ & KOSAKOWSKI PC1500 MAIN ST STE 912SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115-1000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Toner; toner cartridgesACTIVEJun 6, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 21, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 21, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 20, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 16, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance