USPTO serial 77027279
PUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship services for audio and video recordings | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Production, presentation and distribution of educational and entertainment television programs; children's entertainment and education services, namely, providing non-downloadable online interactive games and video on demand; providing non-downloadable games, film and television programs via a video on demand service; entertainment information provided via television; entertainment, sport and cultural services, namely, providing non-downloadable interactive games and video on demand; production of entertainment shows and interactive programs for distribution via television, cable, satellite, audio and video media, cartridges, laser discs, computer discs and electronic means; provision of sound and video recordings, namely, television production services for a video on demand channel featuring children's entertainment; media production services, namely, video on demand production for educational programming; live stage shows; presentation of live performances; theater productions; all for children | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Triplay Digital Content Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by PUFF T.V. LTD
- Other trademarks owned by PUFF T.V. LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PUFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |