USPTO serial 77029256
FREEZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Edward Marquette
I EDWARD MARQUETTE SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPPO BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties, for the purpose of collecting information for handling electronic and commerce transactions; Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties for the purpose of processing electronic payments, electronic billing and invoicing, check conversion and imaging; Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties for the purpose of preventing the accidental, unintended, or unauthorized dissemination, discovery, capture, or use of personally identifying, financial and health information or data; Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties for the purpose of providing information, data, and privacy security, namely, encryption and data segregation; Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties for the purpose of furnishing identity theft protection, data storage and archiving, and sensitive information identification and isolation; and Computer programs and manuals therefor, furnished as a unit to third parties for the purpose of providing data security intrusion alerts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |