USPTO serial 77029370
DREAMCOLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DREAMCOLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Inks, namely, copying inks, inkjet printer ink; toners; inkjet cartridges; toner cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Printing presses | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in producing accurate and consistent color in the field of printing and photocopying; computer software for color management; computer software for color calibration in displaying and printing images; computer utility software; desktop, tablet and handheld computers; personal digital assistants; projection screens; televisions; multifunction printers, namely printers incorporating scanners, photocopiers and fax machines; scanners; photocopiers; facsimile machines; cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DREAMCOLOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |