USPTO serial 77031132
EL CAZO MEXICANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EL CAZO MEXICANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr. BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 Louisiana St.Suite 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen beef for hamburgers, and frozen or refrigerated prepared entrees, meals consisting of poultry, beef, pork, lamb, young goat meat, fish and seafood, namely, chicken nuggets, fish sticks and fish fillets | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen and refrigerated prepared entrees, meals consisting of flour and pasta, namely, pizzas, lasagna, spaghetti, noodles, ravioli, hot cakes, waffles, tamales, burritos, tortillas, fajitas, enchiladas and tacos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Alimentos Congelados, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Alimentos Congelados, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EL CAZO MEXICANO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |