USPTO serial 77031151
C-182 MAGNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-182 MAGNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | 1; The "C-182-Magnum" is a trade name/trade mark I would like to give to unique, highly modified, high performance, high horsepower Cessna-182 (Skylane) airplane; 2; The C-182-Magnum uses a number of new and/or modified sub-components to change the basic Cessna 182 Skylane airplane into a high-performance aircraft; These modifications include but are not limited to-- a) Installation of a number of after-market sub-components currently manufactured and available to the public, that are made by other manufacturing companies, but have never been used together in a complete package; b) Installation of after-market sub-components that I (Peter R Goulding) have made engineering and design changes to, and have received Federal Aviation Administration to use, by obtaining FAA-337 "field approval" authority, c) Include additional new sub-components I have designed and have had engineered locally, that have never been manufactured before and that are not available in any after-market form until this time, but are legal to use by me obtaining additional FAA Form 337 field approvals; 3; Together, all of these modifications, pieces, and sub-components combine into one cohesive high performance system that maximizes the climb and payload carrying capability of a standard Cessna 182 Skylane; 4; Sub-components that are installed in off-the-shelf form include-- a) A high horse power engine that is currently available as after market product, b) Wing extension to increase the wing-span of the aircraft that is currently available as after market product c) A high lift wing airfoil kit that is currently available as an after-market product; 5; Sub-components that are installed that are not off-the-shelf, and have been designed by Peter R Goulding include-- d) Light weight kevlar/fiberglass/carbon-fiber in-flight doors of my own design and as approved by the FAA using Form 337, e) A light weight kevlar/fiberglass/carbon-fiber jump-step of my own design and as approved by the FAA by using a FAA From 337, f) Light weight kevlar/fiberglass/carbon-fiber wing tips, modified by Peter Goulding to fit my particular application; g) Floater-rails (fuselage handles) designed by Peter Goulding and approved by the FAA using a FAA form 337, to give skydivers a hand-hold on the external surface of an aircraft, h) A unique six (6) jumper plus pilot seat-belt system Peter Goulding designed, and received approval for from the FAA for a Cessna-182 using FAA from 337, i) A cabin floor extension system to allow jumpers 32" more legroom into the rear compartment of the fuselage; j) a parachut drogue system to allow a Cessna 182 to descend rapidly and more; 6; Together, all the unique sub-components combine to change a standard Cessna 182 Skylane into a revolutionary, high-performance, high-lift, fast climbing/fast decending aircraft that is principally to be used as a skydiving jump aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |