USPTO serial 77031269
AIRLOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRLOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Rogers
DAVID E. ROGERS SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.SUITE 2700 TWO RENAISSANCE SQ.,40 N. CENTRAL AVE.PHOENIX, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the fields of business supplies, clothing, sunglasses, electronics, books, stationery, foods and beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Providing remote Internet access; providing facsimile transmission and retrieval services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Rental of computers | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Preparation and serving of food and beverages; restaurant and bar services; providing conference rooms, desk space and lounge space | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NYLO Hotels LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NYLO Hotels LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named AIRLOFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |