USPTO serial 77031849
BEST KEPT SECRET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST KEPT SECRET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
GWENN ROOS LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVEWELLESLEY, MA 02482-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar services; Cafe-restaurants; Cafes; Catering; Catering for the provision of food and beverages; Catering of food and drinks; Cocktail lounge buffets; Cocktail lounges; Coffee shops; Coffee-house and snack-bar services; Food preparation; Preparation of food and beverages; Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; Providing on-line reviews of restaurants and hotels; Pubs; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant services; Restaurants; Serving food and drinks; Serving of food and drink/beverages; Tavern services; Tea rooms; Wine bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |