USPTO serial 77032398
D20
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D20?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Paskar, Stephen P. Gilbert, Lawrence G. Kurland, Stephen M. Haracz, Erik Wolff Kahn, David A. Roodman, Daniel A. Crowe, Robert G. Lancaster, George C. Chen, Todd Braverman, Patricia L. Werner, Mark A. Paskar, Lindsay E. Cohen, Nick Williamson, and
MARK A. PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles, namely automobiles; land vehicle wheels; land vehicle wheel accessories, namely, wheel covers, wheel hubs, wheel rims, caps for wheel rims, automobile spare wheel holders, automobile wheel shields, balancing weights for vehicle wheels, wheel bearings for land vehicles, wheel bearing kits for land vehicles, wheel disks, wheel sprockets and wheel suspensions; land vehicle parts, namely, valve stems for vehicle tires, lug nuts for vehicle wheels; body kits comprising various combinations of aero-dynamic fairings, bug shields, convertible tops, door panels, fender flares, fenders, mud guards, running boards, luggage racks, bicycle racks, ski racks, automotive exterior metal decorative and protective trim, automotive exterior extruded decorative and protective trim, roof panels, side shields, soft tops, spoilers; rearview mirrors; shift knobs as parts of gear shifts; hub caps; license plate holders and frames and fasteners; upholstery for vehicles; baby strollers and carriages; wagons; infant strollers and car seats; car seat accessories, namely, car seat cushions, car seat restraints, car seat safety harnesses and car seat belts; fitted car seat covers; car seat head supports; fitted car seat carrier covers; car seat strap covers; car seat neck rolls and neck rests; vehicle accessories and vehicle body parts, namely, seat covers, steering wheel covers, vehicle windows, automobile windshield sun shades, automobile windshield shade screens sun visors, windshield visors, aero-dynamic fairings, bug shields, convertible tops, door panels, fender flares, fenders, mud guards, running boards, roof rack storage containers, luggage racks, luggage carriers, cargo carriers, bicycle racks, ski racks, automotive exterior metal decorative and protective trim, automotive exterior plastic extruded decorative and protective trim, roof panels, side shields, soft tops, anti-theft alarms, back-up warning alarms, burglar alarms, covers for vehicle steering wheels, cup holders, vehicle covers, dashboard covers, liners for cargo areas, tire chains, automotive interior metal decorative and protective trim, vanity mirrors, automotive interior plastic extruded decorative and protective trim, grilles, spoilers, running boards, fender flares; automobiles; trucks; utility vehicles; sports utility vehicles; bicycles; tricycles; motorcycles; rims for bicycles; vehicles, namely, all-terrain vehicles, go-karts, recreational vehicles, scooters, two-wheeled motor vehicles and electronically motorized skateboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |