USPTO serial 77032607
D20
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D20?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Paskar
Mark A. Paskar BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-3300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, AUTOMOBILES; LAND VEHICLE WHEELS; LAND VEHICLE WHEEL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WHEEL COVERS, WHEEL HUBS, WHEEL RIMS, CAPS FOR WHEEL RIMS, AUTOMOBILE SPARE WHEEL HOLDERS, AUTOMOBILE WHEEL SHIELDS, BALANCING WEIGHTS FOR VEHICLE WHEELS, WHEEL BEARINGS FOR LAND VEHICLES, WHEEL BEARING KITS FOR LAND VEHICLES, WHEEL DISKS FOR VEHICLES, WHEEL SPROCKETS AND WHEEL SUSPENSIONS; LAND VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, VALVE STEMS FOR VEHICLE TIRES, LUG NUTS FOR VEHICLE WHEELS; AUTOMOTIVE BODY KITS COMPRISING VARIOUS COMBINATIONS OF EXTERNAL STRUCTURAL PARTS OF AUTOMOBILES, NAMELY, AERO-DYNAMIC FAIRINGS, BUG SHIELDS, CONVERTIBLE TOPS, DOOR PANELS, FENDER FLARES, FENDERS, MUD GUARDS, RUNNING BOARDS, LUGGAGE RACKS, BICYCLE RACKS, SKI RACKS, AUTOMOTIVE EXTERIOR METAL DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, AUTOMOTIVE EXTERIOR PLASTIC EXTRUDED DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, ROOF PANELS, SIDE SHIELDS, SOFT TOPS, SPOILERS; REARVIEW MIRRORS; GEAR SHIFT KNOBS AS PARTS OF GEAR SHIFTS; HUB CAPS; LICENSE PLATE HOLDERS, FRAMES, AND FASTENERS; UPHOLSTERY FOR VEHICLES; BABY STROLLERS AND CARRIAGES; WAGONS; INFANT STROLLERS AND CAR SEATS; CAR SEAT ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CAR SEAT CUSHIONS, CAR SEAT SAFETY RESTRAINTS, CAR SEAT SAFETY HARNESSES AND CAR SEAT BELTS; FITTED CAR SEAT COVERS; HEAD RESTS FOR SEATS FOR AUTOMOBILES; FITTED CAR SEAT CARRIER COVERS; CAR SEAT STRAP COVERS; LAND VEHICLE ACCESSORIES AND LAND VEHICLE BODY PARTS, NAMELY, SEAT COVERS, STEERING WHEEL COVERS, VEHICLE WINDOWS, AUTOMOBILE WINDSHIELD SUN SHADES, AUTOMOBILE WINDSHIELD SUN VISORS, WINDSHIELD VISORS, AERO-DYNAMIC FAIRINGS, BUG SHIELDS AS A STRUCTURAL PART OF VEHICLES, CONVERTIBLE TOPS, DOOR PANELS, FENDER FLARES, FENDERS, MUD GUARDS, RUNNING BOARDS, ROOF RACK STORAGE CONTAINERS, LUGGAGE RACKS, LUGGAGE CARRIERS, CARGO CARRIERS, BICYCLE RACKS, SKI RACKS, AUTOMOTIVE EXTERIOR METAL DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, AUTOMOTIVE EXTERIOR PLASTIC EXTRUDED DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, ROOF PANELS, SIDE SHIELDS AS STRUCTURAL PARTS OF VEHICLES, SOFT TOPS, ANTI-THEFT ALARMS, BACK-UP WARNING ALARMS, BURGLAR ALARMS, COVERS FOR VEHICLE STEERING WHEELS, CUP HOLDERS, FITTED AND SEMI-FITTED VEHICLE COVERS, FITTED AND SEMI-FITTED DASHBOARD COVERS, FITTED AND SEMI-FITTED LINERS FOR VEHICLE CARGO AREAS, TIRE CHAINS, AUTOMOTIVE INTERIOR METAL DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, VANITY MIRRORS, AUTOMOTIVE INTERIOR PLASTIC EXTRUDED DECORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE TRIM, GRILLES, SPOILERS, RUNNING BOARDS, FENDER FLARES; AUTOMOBILES; TRUCKS; UTILITY LAND VEHICLES; SPORTS UTILITY VEHICLES; BICYCLES; TRICYCLES; MOTORCYCLES; WHEEL RIMS FOR BICYCLES; VEHICLES, NAMELY, ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES, GO-KARTS; RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, NAMELY, CAMPERS AND TRUCK CAMPERS, SCOOTERS, TWO-WHEELED MOTOR VEHICLES AND ELECTRONICALLY MOTORIZED SKATEBOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |