USPTO serial 77032782
ACTIVE PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert P. Williams
Herbert P. Williams Foley & Lardner LLP2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Synthetic resins for eradication of microorganisms | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Disinfectant spray for elimination of microorganisms | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Filters for non-potable fluids, namely water and any other beverages contaminated with foreign or harmful substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Tents and other collapsible self-contained shelters made of fabric and offering protection against airborne particulates, certain microorganisms and chemical agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Safe Life Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Safe Life Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named ACTIVE PROTECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |