Drawing for MISS PINK

USPTO serial 77033302

MISS PINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISS PINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Arturi

PETER A ARTURI COHEN & WOLF PC158 DEER HILL AVEDANBURY, CT 06810-7728UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line stories in the field of memoirsABANDONEDSep 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 26, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 26, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 26, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance