Drawing for ENERGISTICS

USPTO serial 77033363

ENERGISTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGISTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW R. MOSCICKI

MATTHEW R. MOSCICKI Conley Rose, P.C.P.O. Box 3267Houston, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, arranging and conducting seminars, lectures and continuing education programs regarding the production and use of standards via data exchange formats for use in the fields of energy exploration, production and distribution; publication of printed material via data exchange formats featuring standards for use in the fields of energy exploration, production and distributionACTIVENov 8, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2009EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Dec 19, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 4, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 16, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance