USPTO serial 77033371
Serial No. 77033371
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77033371?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Kelly
CHRISTOPHER KELLY WILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others; dissemination of advertisements and of advertising materials; distribution of products for advertising purposes; providing information about the goods and services of others via a global computer network; promoting, arranging and conducting trade shows and exhibitions, including on-line trade shows and exhibitions, in a wide variety of fields; providing home shopping services for a variety of consumer goods by means of television and cable television or other broadcast mediums,namely, radio, satellite and via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | leasing of shopping center and shopping mall space; commercial real estate leasing services; operating market places for sellers of goods and/or services; real estate listing; leasing, brokerage and management of units of retail space in shopping malls; real estate management; leasing of food service facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction of shopping malls, shopping centers, entertainment complexes and hotels; real estate development | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | television broadcasting; transmission of data, sound and images by satellite; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; and communication by television for meetings; subscription television broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | arranging of exhibitions, seminars and conferences; conducting exhibitions for entertainment purposes; providing cooking classes and educational demonstrations in the field of cooking; providing courses of instruction at the college and post graduate levels; business training; entertainment services in the nature of television programming on a variety of topics; television production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |