USPTO serial 77033799
PANCAKE DIPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANCAKE DIPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dawsonville, GA
Dawsonville, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Sovinski
Sandra M. Sovinski Innovative IP, LLCP.O. Box 217New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sandwiches consisting of hot cakes with meat filling; dough-based pockets with filling consisting primarily of sausage; Foodstuffs in the nature of a meatball coated primarily with pancake batter infused with syrup; Prepared breakfast meat pies; Prepared foodstuffs consisting of batter and syrup filled primarily with beef, chicken, pork, egg, and cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |