Drawing for BIOLOGICS

USPTO serial 77034053

BIOLOGICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOLOGICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph D. Lewis

Joseph D. Lewis Barnes & Thornburg LLP1717 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Ste 500Washington, DC 20006-4623UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Orthopaedic implants comprised of natural biological material; human tissue allografts; processed human tissue used to stimulate new bone formation in spine, orthopaedic and trauma surgical applications; bone grafts processed from human tissue; tissue implant graft material made from processed living tissue for implantation into an area of weakened or damaged tissue, which provides a framework or scaffold onto which human tissue grows; mineralized collagen bone grafting product used for directing the regeneration of boneACTIVE—
010Orthopaedic implants comprised of synthetic material; artificial bone substitution materials; synthetic bone graft substitute for the repair of bony defects; surgical instruments for orthopaedic use; Surgical instruments for use in bone marrow aspiration procedures and for use in the implantation of bone graft materials; Medical devices for use in orthopaedic surgery, namely, a platelet concentrate system for making platelet rich plasma, mixing it with synthetic or autogenous bone grafting materials, and delivering it to a surgical site; medical devices for use in the delivery of bone graft material to an orthopaedic surgical siteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 16, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance