USPTO serial 77034713
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | 1; The "Eclipse" is a brand name/trade name given to a very unique sport parachute harness and container system as originally designed, developed, and named the "Eclipse" back in 1982; The system's original designer was a parachute engineer and Master Parachute Technician named Bill Johnson of Atlanta, GA; Under the name of his company, Quantum Leap Enterprises, Bill Johnson was given a license by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) to manufacture, market, and sell this parachute harness and container system to the skydiving community using the name "Eclipse"; In 2005 I purchased Quantum Leap Enterprises and the "Eclipse" TSO (a Federal License issued by the FAA), to manufacture this particular parachute harness and container system; Note-- Back in 1982, a trade mark/trade name was not applied for formally; 2; The name "Eclipse" is noted on documentation submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to identify this particular parachute system; The Federal Aviation Administration issued a TSO (Technical Standard Order a federal "license") to Quantum Leap Enterprises in 1982, to allow the manufacture of this parachute harness and container system; The FAA document package that contains the blue prints, construction diagrams, construction procedures, and quality assurance and quality control manuals (as required by the FAA), refer to this particular design of sport parachute harness and container as the "Eclipse" model on all documents, blue-prints, and construction directions; Note-- Other manufacturers of other competitive brands of harness and container designs, use other brand names to differentiate (and market) their own particular harness and container system to the skydiving community; For example, other parachute harness and container systems names include the-- "Talon", "Telesis", "Javelin", "Racer", "VooDoo", "Vortex", "Vector", Sidewinder", etc; 3; The "Eclipse" harness and container system is completely unique within the parachute industry in that the system is extremely simple and easy to manufacture, yet it is still qualified under a FAA TSO (above); The "Eclipse" harness and container system is basically sewn together from only seven (7) major pieces of fabric and webbing; Most all other competitive sport parachute harness and container systems use over 10-times this number of pieces of fabric, webbing, and hardware in their construction; 4; Directly, and because it is so simple a design, the "Eclipse" is further unique because it only requires approximately 15-man hours to sew together; The typical (competition's design) harness and container system required nearly 3-times this amount of man-hours to construct; 5; The FAA issued their TSO (license to manufacture) the "Eclipse" only to Mr; Bill Johnson and Quantum Leap Enterprises (a sole proprietorship small business, owned by Bill Johnson) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |