USPTO serial 77035152
BOOKKEEPER TECHNICIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3490727Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOOKKEEPER TECHNICIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cherry Hill, NJ
Cherry Hill, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart M. Goldstein
Stuart M. Goldstein Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey, PLLC750 Rt. 73S., Suite 202BMarlton, NJ 08053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Bookkeeping and accounting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |