USPTO serial 77035632
TAI CHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAI CHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
TANYA M REITZEL; COASTAL TRADEMARK SERV VANCOUVER; BCC - BRITISH COLUMBIAV6B4N6BOX 12109; 2200-555 W HASTINGS ST,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | baby and toddler care products, namely, diaper bags and baby carriers worn on the body; pet products and pet accessories, namely, clothing for domestic pets, collars for pets, electronic pet collars, canvas, vinyl and leather pouches for holding disposable bags to place pet waste in, pet collar accessories, namely, bows and charms, pet leashes, restraining devices, namely, tie-out stakes and tie-out chains; souvenirs, namely, souvenir bags; novelty items, namely, leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | pet products and pet accessories, namely, brushes for pets, nail trimmers for pets, cages for pets, pet feeding dishes and scoops for the disposal of pet waste; souvenirs, namely, souvenir plates and ceramic figurines; house wares, namely, baby bottles, pacifiers, monitors and nursers; dinnerware, namely, cups, mugs, plates, saucers, bowls and drinking glasses; household utensils, namely, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks, graters and strainers; pots and pans, lunch boxes, placemats and napkin rings | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | baby, toddler and children's clothing, namely, infant wear, infant and toddler one piece clothing, bibs, shirts, sweaters, pants, skirts, bathing suits, undergarments and pajamas; headgear for babies, toddlers and children, namely, hats, caps, toques and visors; footwear for babies, toddlers and children, namely, shoes, boots, sandals and slippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | pet products and pet accessories, namely, pet toys; children's toys, namely, baby multiple activity toys, bath toys, battery operated action toys, bendable toys, children's activity tables containing manipulative toys with convert to easels, children's multiple activity toys, children's multiple activity toys sold as a unit with printed books, children's wire construction and art activity toys, collectable toy figures, construction toys, crib toys, drawing toys, electronic action toys, electronic toy vehicles, fantasy character toys, infant action crib toys, infant development toys, inflatable toys, lever action toys, mechanical toys, musical toys, non-electronic toy vehicles, plastic character toys, play mats containing infant toys, plush toys, pop up toys, positionable printed toy figures for use in games and puzzles, pull toys, punching toys, push toys, radio controlled toy vehicles, sandbox toys, squeezable squeaking toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail stores featuring children's toys, toddler and baby care products, children's, toddler's and babies' clothing, pet care products, pet accessories, house wares (excluding toilet trainers), dinnerware, souvenirs and novelty items | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zhang, Wen
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TAI CHI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |