USPTO serial 77036915
SERINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After sun creams; Anti-aging cream; Anti-wrinkle cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Aromatherapy creams; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Cleansing creams; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Eye cream; Face creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansers; Facial cleansing milk; Facial emulsions; Facial lotion; Facial make-up; Facial masks; Hair removing cream; Lip cream; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Nail cream; Night cream; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Perfumed creams; Pre-shave creams; Skin cleansing cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin whitening creams; Sunscreen creams; Wrinkle resistant cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |