Drawing for BUDGET ROYAL CARD

USPTO serial 77037317

BUDGET ROYAL CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUDGET ROYAL CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

Cory M. Amron VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST NW FL 11WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded credit cards and debit cardsACTIVE—
016Credit cards and debit cards without magnetic encodingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 25, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance