USPTO serial 77038527
PROFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PROFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buffalo Grove, IL
Buffalo Grove, IL
Buffalo Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Mack Crandall
Molly Mack Crandall BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SOIL CONDITIONERS FOR HORTICULTURE USE; CHEMICALS AND CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS, NAMELY, SOIL STABILIZERS AND TACKIFIERS USED TO STABILIZE SOIL, INCREASE WATER PENETRATION, AND PREVENT EROSION; PLANTING SOIL; SOIL IMPROVING AGENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS; WOOD FIBER MATS FOR EROSION CONTROL; AND GEOTEXTILE MATTING FOR TURF REINFORCEMENT AND STABILIZATION | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2000 |
| 031 | MULCHES, HYDRAULIC MULCHES, FIBER MULCHES | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 1999 |
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND CONSULTATION RELATED THERETO, IN THE FIELDS OF TURF MANAGEMENT, LANDSCAPING, SOIL CONDITIONS, AND EROSION CONTROL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PROFILE PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROFILE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |