Drawing for SOY EXPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 77039258

SOY EXPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOY EXPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicolette R. Hudson

Nicolette R. Hudson Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC255 East Fifth Street2900 Chemed CenterCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All-purpose cleaners containing soyACTIVE—
005Air deodorizer containing soy; Air fresheners containing soyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance