USPTO serial 77039596
PERFECT CONTOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2008
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT CONTOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI
FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
Commerce Township, MI
Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
Commerce Township, MI
Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
Commerce Township, MI
Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
Matthew R. Mowers Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48390Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | HEATING PADS NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO., LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO. d/b/a HOMEDICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PERFECT CONTOUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |