USPTO serial 77040109
GLAMSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLAMSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags, All-purpose athletic bags, All-purpose carrying bags, Athletic bags, Bags and hold-alls for sports clothing, Handbags, Bags for sports, Book bags, Carry-all bags, Clutch bags, Small purses, Cosmetic bags sold empty, Clutches purses, purses, small clutches, Leather purses, Multi-purpose purses, Chain mesh purses, pocket wallets | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |